Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and by a fine of five hundred thousand won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are de facto people in a de facto marital relationship.

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2017. 5. 11. 20:40 경 양평군 양평읍 관문 길 22번 길 7 양일 중학교 앞 노상에서 피고인의 아들 D이 폭행을 당한 사건에 대하여 112 신고를 받고 출동한 양 평 경찰서 E 파출소 소속 경찰관 피해자 F의 사건처리 속도가 마음에 들지 않는다는 이유로 화가 나서, 함께 출동한 소방관 3명을 비롯하여 불특정 다수의 행인들이 보는 가운데 피해자에게 큰 소리로 “ 짭새는 뭐하는 거냐

The victim openly insultingd the victim by openly pointing out his desire to "Woo kb kb kb at a low time," because there is no farb farb farb.

2. Defendant B, on May 11, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant was assaulted by Defendant B at the end of the 7th two middle school on May 201, 201, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, 2017, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, on the ground that the Defendant’s rate of handling the instant case by the police officer F of the victim F of the police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report from 112 on the case as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, was not attributable to his mind. Defendant B, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, was a large sound, for the victim’s large sound.

In other words, “the victim openly insulting the victim”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F, D and G;

1. A president of the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement protocol to F;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which led to the instant crime, are examined by the police officer who was under contact with the Defendant A to the effect that he had different children D, and was going to the site. The police officer F, who was at the site, was under contact with the Defendant A, was investigating about the circumstances where the F, rather than sending DNA to the hospital.