A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 19, 2014, the Defendant was driving a rocketing-free vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.248% from the 4km section, from the 4km section to the 5km in front of the stage tri-dong apartment, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the speed of 0.248% from the 4km section.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B rocketing car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving).

On August 19, 2014, the Defendant, at around 22:58, 2014, sniffing alcohol in a drunken state, sniffing snow and walked properly, and failed to walk properly, making it difficult to drive normally due to the influence of drinking such as drinking, but, on the other hand, the Defendant driven the said car, driving the said car at a three-lane road in front of the Hannam Apartment Apartment apartment at the original city level, and driving the car at a non-speed speed one lane in the direction of the Kravian apartment in the direction of the Kavian apartment.

At the time, since it is night and a road where a center line is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by keeping the front line and the left and right of the driver of the motor vehicle well, and driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and neglected to do so at the center line, thereby leading up to the front part of the victim E(S. 40 years old) driving, which was parked in front of the shopping apartment commercial building located on the tri-wing apartment building located on the flive road flock, and the left part of the victim E(S. 40 years old) driving which was stopped later, the front part of the flive passenger vehicle flocked at the same time.

Ultimately, in order to communicate each other by the above occupational negligence, the Defendant left the above damaged passenger cars and let the victims who were on the side of the above damaged passenger cars go beyond the above rocketing passenger cars while avoiding the above rocketing passenger cars.