The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (a year of imprisonment and an additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant reflects the mistake; (b) the fact that the Defendant voluntarily reported the administration of phiphones to an investigative agency; (c) the fact that the Defendant actively cooperates in the investigation of accomplices; and (d) the fact that the health status is not good; (c) the Defendant repeats the purchase and administration of phiphones at least three months after the Defendant was released from the same criminal record; (d) the previous conviction reaches 13 times; and (e) the Defendant’s previous conviction and the instant crime are highly likely to recommit

In full view of the unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and thus dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.