logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.06.27 2013고단818
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant C of 6 months, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B subscribed to multiple insurance policies under the name of Defendant B’s father E, and conspired with F, G, H, I, J, E, etc. to receive insurance proceeds from an insurance company by intentionally taking out a traffic accident.

Therefore, the Defendant, at around 20:30 on December 29, 2010, filed a claim for the payment of insurance proceeds from Hansung Insurance Co., Ltd, the victim, on January 10, 201, as if the said accident occurred due to the driver’s negligence, and received KRW 12,99,170 in total as the compensation for medical expenses from Hansung Insurance, Hyundai Sea, Samsung F&M, MIG damage insurance, Dong department fire, and AI life insurance, and received KRW 12,99,170 in total as the compensation for medical expenses.

G receives total amount of KRW 3,980,990 for the purpose of medical expenses, etc. from AI life insurance, and receives total amount of KRW 5,868,730 for the purpose of medical expenses, etc. from Hdo Chineseized Damage Insurance, LIG Damage Insurance, Eastern Fire, Mz Fire, and AI life insurance, and receives KRW 482,020 for the purpose of medical expenses, etc. from Ido Chineseized Damage Insurance.

As a result, Defendant B, in collusion with F, G, H, I, J, and E, received a total of KRW 23,30,910 for insurance proceeds from the damaged insurance companies, such as foreign currency damage insurance, and received a total of KRW 48,262,470 from the affected insurance companies by intentionally committing a minor accident twice in total, such as the attached Table 1 [Crimes List 1], in which case E, etc., was hospitalized for a long time at the hospital and claimed insurance proceeds, and received a total of KRW 48,262,470 from the affected insurance companies.

2. Defendant A, Defendant C’s joint criminal conduct, and Defendant C, have subscribed to a large number of insurance policies under the name of the Defendants, and have intentionally granted the insurance proceeds from the insurance company.

arrow