The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's conviction is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts that the court below found the defendant guilty, despite the fact that the defendant knew that E had sold the lawsuit to E, or G had it provided the lawsuit, to E, and that E had the intention to deliver it in the table outside of the instant table of study.

2. In light of the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below and the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i.e., E and F consistently stated, unlike the defendant's assertion, that they did not make a false statement, and that at the time E and F ordered to do so, it appears that they were in the house of this case, and that at the time E and E were in the order to do so, the defendant was in the house of this case, and it seems small to have been in the number of 3 times the table inside the house of this case, and e and e were in the size to have been in the number of 3 times the table table inside the house of this case, and e and e were in drinking while carrying the house of this case. In light of the Gap's statement (a statement that 30 to 40 minutes were in the original court) and the field photographs at the time of regulation, the defendant's assertion that E and E had not been in the house of this case for a considerable period of time is not known to other customers at the time of E and there were no reasons for other customers.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.