(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.04.10 2012고정2330

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.04.10 2012고정2330

청소년보호법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of “D” on the first floor of Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central Government.

Around 02:20 on June 23, 2012, the Defendant sold to four juveniles, including E (Nam and 15 years of age), two disease weeks, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to G, etc., and sold to four juveniles, such as E (Nam and 15 years of age), two disease weeks, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, in an amount equivalent to KRW 19,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Partial statement of witness E in the third protocol of trial;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 51 Subparag. 8 and Article 26(1) of the former Juvenile Protection Act (amended by Act No. 11048, Sept. 15, 201) on criminal facts

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not know at all that he ordered the defendant's birth-friendly G, who had been trying to deliver to the defendant's appearance outside the restaurant of this case, to provide the defendant's birth-friendly G, and that he did not know that the defendant ordered the lawsuit or provided the plaintiff with the lawsuit to the E.

However, according to the evidence in the above "the summary of evidence", E can be acknowledged the fact that he ordered the lawsuit in the above restaurant, not in the tables outside the restaurant of this case (the witness G's statement contrary thereto is hard to believe in light of the relation between G and the defendant). This is so small that the size of the above restaurant is considerably small to the extent that 30,000 the table of the above restaurant is set up, and the above restaurant seems to have well site during the week of the above restaurant, and there are no other customers at the time of the above restaurant of this case, the defendant ordered the lawsuit of E and the share price to E.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고정1162

-대구지방법원 2015.06.26 2015고정109

-인천지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고정2212

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.06.05 2012고정578

-대전지방법원 2013.08.13 2012고합636