1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was newly appointed as a teacher on May 20, 1980 to a public educational official and served as a art teacher from March 1, 2014 to B high school.

B. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant requested a disciplinary decision to the General Disciplinary Committee of the Public Educational Officials in Chungcheongnam-do on the grounds that the Plaintiff committed a misconduct as follows and violated Article 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act. On October 5, 2015, the said disciplinary committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff in accordance with Article 15 of the Decree on Disciplinary Measures against Public Educational Officials and Article 2 [Attachment 1-2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Public Officials Disciplinary Decree (Provided, That on October 14, 2015, Article 2 [Attachment 1] of the Enforcement Rule of the Public Officials Disciplinary Decree was corrected as the disciplinary criteria].

Accordingly, on October 14, 2015, the Defendant issued a disciplinary measure to dismiss the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant measure”) according to the resolution of the said disciplinary committee.

원고는 B고등학교의 교사로 재직할 당시 2014학년도 학기 중 수업시간에 “구림공고 남녀 학생들이 영암 왕인박사 유적지에 이성끼리 진한 스킨십과 껴안고 뽀뽀하려고 들어간다”고 말하고, 이어 C 학생을 손으로 가리키면서 “쟤는 그거를 좋아해서 저런다고, 커서 그걸 좋아할 것”이라고 말한 사실이 있으며, 2014학년도 11월경 위 동일 학생에게 “남자친구랑 둘이 잤냐”라고 말하는 등 학생(여)으로 하여금 성적 수치심과 굴욕감을 유발케 하는 성희롱 발언을 한 사실이 있음(이하 ‘제1비위행위’라 한다). 평소 학생들에게 “호로 새끼” 등 심한 욕설과 폭언을 자주 하였고(이하 ‘제2비위행위’라 한다), 또한 학생들에게 “요즘 선생들 미친년들이 많다”라고 동료 여교사를 험담한 사실이 있으며(이하 ‘제3비위행위’라 한다), 학생과 언쟁 중 뺨을 때린 폭행사실(이하 ‘제4비위행위’라 한다)이 있음 이러한 제반 사실 등으로 학생 다수의...