A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 1, 2019, at the house of the Defendant of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B apartment C, on the grounds that alcohol cannot be known, the Defendant expressed a bath to the victim D (the age of 52) of a de facto de facto marriage who was diving, followed the victim's head and line, taken the victim's head and line, taken the victim's head and line, walk back the victim's head, body, face, and taken the victim's face, taken the victim's head, body, face, taken the victim's clothes from the victim's escape to the victim's escape, and put the victim's left part where the victim's clothes cannot be identified.

2. At around 20:31 on July 10, 2020, the Defendant threatened the victim with the voice message “A person during the night, during the night, who gets off the knife in the knife knife knife knife, knife knife knife, knife knife, and knife knife knife, knife knife knife.”

3. At around 14:15 on July 18, 2020, the Defendant: (a) talked with the victim while drinking alcohol at the entrance of the Seo-gu, 215 Seo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that the victim did not her pursuant to drinking alcohol at the center of the Seo-gu, Seoul, 215, the Defendant: (b) taken the kitchen knife (20cm length, 33cm in total length) of the Defendant’s back, which is a dangerous thing in the Defendant’s back, carried the kitchen knife in the Defendant’s back to the left hand; and (c) threatened the victim with dangerous things by acting as a knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. To capture each photograph, internal report, investigation report (the content of the voice message file sent by the suspect), and the audio message screen;

1. The Defendant alleged that the protocol of seizure, the list of seized articles, the Defendant’s assertion and judgment were in a state of weak ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing each crime.