beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document on July 29, 2014.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015 Highest 2005]
1. On May 9, 2012, the defrauded Co., Ltd. arranged a lease agreement on the F detached Housing at the office of “E” in the office of the Defendant’s operation at the time of the Speaker-si, the Government-Si, and was delegated to the Lessee to enter into a contract with the Lessee as the Lessee as to the pertinent housing amounting to KRW 4 million and KRW 200,000,000 per month.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, the defendant was delegated by the lessor G to enter into a contract for the above detached house of KRW 1 million, monthly rent of KRW 230,000,000, and the purpose was to use the deposit received from the victim for the investment of stocks.
Nevertheless, on May 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received KRW 400,000 from the victim to the account in the name of one bank under the name of the Defendant; (c) received KRW 3.6 million as a balance on May 18, 2012; and (d) received KRW 3.6 million as a result of delivery to G; and (c) paid only KRW 1 million as a deposit to G; and (d) obtained KRW 90,000,000,000 per month from the monthly rent of 30 times over 30,000 won by paying the difference to G.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. On April 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) arranged a lease agreement with the Government I Loan 202 at the office described in paragraph (1) around April 12, 2014; and (b) was delegated by the lessor to enter into a contract with the Lessee for the pertinent housing amounting to KRW 15 million and KRW 180,000 per month.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, the defendant was delegated by the J to enter into a contract on the above real estate as KRW 2 million, monthly rent of KRW 300,000,000, and the purpose was to use the deposit received from the injured party for the investment of stocks.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, thereby making the victim feel, one million won as the down payment around April 14, 2014 from the victim, and one another as the remainder payment around April 27, 2014.