logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.2.18.선고 2015도17521 판결
2015도17521존속살해(인정된죄명:존속상해치사),사체유기·(병합)치료감호
Cases

2015Do17521 Murder (a recognized crime: Bodily Injury on Lineal Ascendant; Death on Lineal Ascendant); abandonment of a corpse

2015do40 (Joint Medical Treatment and Custody)

Paryaryary

Applicant for Medical Treatment and Custody

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant and Applicant for Medical Treatment and Custody

Defense Counsel

Attorney K (Korean National Assembly Line)

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 2015No416, 2015No15 decided October 29, 2015 (Joint)

Judgment

Imposition of Judgment

February 18, 2016

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Defendant case

Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the charges of this case (excluding the part on acquittal of reasoning) were guilty on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical

Furthermore, under Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing is allowed only when a sentence of death or imprisonment with or without prison labor for an indefinite term or for not less than ten years is imposed. In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on a defendant and an applicant for medical care and custody (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") and a minor sentence is imposed, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate

2. As to the medical treatment and custody claim

When a defendant files an appeal against a prosecuted case, the appeal is deemed to have been filed regarding the medical treatment and custody claim. However, the appellate brief does not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal and does not state the grounds for appeal.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Lee Sang-hoon

Justices Kim Jae-tae

Note 1 Justice Jo Hee-de

Justices Park Sang-ok

arrow