logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.01.12 2014누729
재임용거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows, and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is presented as evidence submitted at the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance is not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that the rejection disposition of this case, which was conducted without a reasonable and objective review of the plaintiff, is an abuse of discretion and is illegal, is the same as the part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of each of the evidence under Articles 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, which are presented as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] The second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance " March 1, 1981" shall be added to " March 10, 1981".

The second and tenth written judgments of the first instance court " July 19, 2012" shall be followed by " July 20, 2012".

The third and fourth written judgments of the first instance court (as of the 31st day of the same month, the Plaintiff was issued as E-middle school teacher) shall be appointed as E-middle school teacher on the 13th day of the same month and issued a personnel order on March 1, 2013.).

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow