Of the first judgment, the part on Defendant B and the second judgment on Defendant Q, DR, S, and EJ respectively.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal [2014No843]

A. The sentence of Defendant B, E, and F sentenced by the lower court to the Defendants (two years of imprisonment, ten months of imprisonment, and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. A prosecutor [Defendant C] 1] misunderstanding of facts (not guilty part) E, A, and F conspiredd to acquire money by forging the apartment house lease contract that A resides at the monthly length. Defendant C, who was aware of only F, introduced the former owner to A, and was to be distributed part of the money borrowed from the former owner. E, A, etc. forged the contract around January 14, 201 and obtained a fixed date on January 14, 201. Defendant C obtained a forged lease contract on February 16, 201. After that, Defendant C, etc., obtained the above forged lease contract as collateral and distributed money by deceiving the victim with the above counterfeit lease contract, and Defendant C was aware of the forgery of the above contract at the time of borrowing the money, and the lower court determined that it was reasonable to view that there was an unlawful punishment for Defendant C’s crime by conspiracy with Defendant C’s intention to use the above forged lease contract in a successive manner.

[2014No1385] A.