A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has forged a real estate lease contract to use money as security.

1. The Defendant drafted a real estate lease contract for an apartment building owned by the owner of each type C at a place where it is difficult to know the location of the date and aesthetic place on December 2010, the Defendant drafted a real estate lease contract for the apartment building owned by the owner of each type C, and affixed a seal on each name and seal on each side of the real estate’s name in the indication column of the real estate. The Defendant stated, “A” in the indication column of the real estate, “A” in the column of the deposit, “C” in the column of the address, “B”, “A” in the resident registration number column, “A” in the lessee’s address column, “A” and “A” in the column of the address, “A” and “B” in the column of the resident registration number, “G” and “B” in the column of the date.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On December 22, 2010, the Defendant: (a) borrowed KRW 10 million from the International Office of Law Firm I located in Yong-gu, Yong-gu, Yong-gu; (b) and (c) exercised the right to claim KRW 40 million as stated in a forged real estate lease agreement as if the real estate lease agreement was duly concluded, as stated in paragraph (1).

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant displayed a forged lease agreement with the victim J at the time and place stated in Paragraph 2, and falsely stated that “When intending to operate a club, it would transfer a claim for a deposit with a deposit of KRW 40 million, if it is necessary to lend the amount of reserve funds to KRW 10 million.”

However, in fact, since the above lease contract was forged, there was no difference in the fact that such a contract was concluded, so there was no claim for the deposit.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim and deducts the interest from the Defendant’s name to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant, 8,540.