logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.10.18 2019도11326
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

If the appellate court reverses and renders self-determination of the judgment of the first instance on the grounds that are not included in the grounds for appeal, it shall be deemed that the grounds for appeal by the appellant were determined in the process of determining the punishment, and it shall not be deemed that the appellate court omitted the judgment on the legitimacy of the grounds for appeal, on the ground that it did not expressly state the decision as to the propriety of the grounds for appeal (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3035, Jun. 29, 2007). Therefore

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow