The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant's judgment on the grounds for appeal of this case is against the recognition of each of the crimes of this case, the fact that the defendant scraped a vehicle which had been driven at the time of the trial, and that he would not drive under the influence of alcohol again, and the fact that the victims are seeking the defendant's wife by mutual consent with the victims at the investigation stage, etc. are considered in favor of the defendant.

However, the defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times, including punishment for the same crime. On July 13, 2013, when he was sentenced to a fine under the influence of alcohol without a license, he/she caused a traffic accident by driving the same vehicle under the influence of alcohol without a license, and on this occasion, 3 days after he/she was investigated by the prosecution, and causing a traffic accident by driving again the same vehicle under the same license. The defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of committing the crime of this case was higher than 0.168% and the risk of the accident was not high, and the risk was realized as the accident actually occurred, and the victim's report was sent to the police at will after the crime of this case, and the situation of the crime was not good after the crime of this case, such as leaving the scene with the victim's report after the crime of this case, the court below's decision that sentenced the defendant to the maximum punishment within the scope of the punishment mitigated by the statutory punishment for the crime of this case (Article 6 of the Road Traffic Act).

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.