Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 00:30 on October 25, 2019, the Defendant revised part of the contents of prosecution in accordance with the facts obtained through the examination of evidence, to the extent that it does not disadvantage the Defendant’s defense right, without following the procedures for the examination of evidence, when the Defendant saw the victim B (a person, fel, and 26 years of age) to get “former wheel wheel,” on the road near the exit of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yeongdeungpo-gu No. 27. In response to the influence of the Defendant’s defense right, the Defendant sawd part of the contents of prosecution to the extent that he did not disadvantage the Defendant’s defense right.
The victims were forced to commit indecent acts.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that although the defendant and his/her legal statement of the witness B and C (the defendant and his/her defense counsel stated that the wheel chairs of the victim did not go to or go to the victim so that the victim does not go to or do so, they did not commit an indecent act against the victim's will.
However, the victim committed an indecent act against the victim as stated in the facts of the crime in the process of taking the method of wheel chairs by the defendant in the court.
was stated.
The victim's statement includes consistent and unexploied contents from the investigative agency to the court with respect to the situation where the victim first met with the victim's provoking C on the day of the instant case, the circumstance where the victim transferred the law from the defendant to the electric wheel chairs, the harm caused by the indecent act in the process, and the circumstances where the victim reported the defendant, etc., and the victim's statement contains consistent and unexploied contents, and C's legal statement also is recognized as credibility, such as consistent with the victim
The defendant made a false report upon the request by the wife of the defendant.
One of the arguments is that the defendant's wife, who is not aware of the victim, requested the risk of perjury and perjury.