The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On August 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of “D” food in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) the victim’s market price owned by the victim E set up and set by the victim E, 1 million won; and (c) the Defendant used one gallon juth of 5 mobile phones at the market price of the victim’s ownership owned by the victim E.

2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor that the defendant used the victim's cell phone as a criminal intent to steals was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

On August 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 22:06:01 first commissioned driving and moved to and from the place of departure from the electric wheelchairs, and (b) 2:11 on August 4, 2017, the Defendant was seated in front of the “D” food in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (c) as the victim was found to have a cell phone that did not have any responsibility to do so, the Defendant immediately carried the victim’s cell phone on the front wheelchairs of the electric wheelchairs that he was in possession.

After that, the defendant received an application from his occupation as an agent for his occupation and completed his substitute driving service on five occasions.

피고인이 휴대전화 단말기를 통하여 계속하여 수신 벨소리를 들었음에도 전화를 받지 않고, 수신 알림을 벨 소리에서 무음으로 바꿨기는 하나, 변호인이 제출한 대리 운전업무기록과 통화 내역 및 가방 사진 등의 증거들에 비추어 보면, 당일 생업인 대리 운전 업무에 바쁘게 종사하던 피고인으로서는 습득물인 휴대전화를 곧바로 돌려줄 여유를 찾기 어려웠던 것으로 볼 여지도 상당할 뿐 아니라, 운전 업무를 마친 직후 돌려 줄 의사로 전동 휠 가방에 휴대전화를 담아 두었기 때문에 피해자의 전화벨에 곧바로 응답하지 못하였다는 진술도 수긍할 만하다고

On the other hand, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is about theft.