Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff (Law Firm continental Aju, Attorneys Yoon Sung-ho et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
The Director of Gangnam District Office
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 7, 2012
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap942 decided April 27, 2012
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The imposition of each gift tax stated in the attached Form No. 1 on March 4, 2011 by the Defendant against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.
Reasons
The reasons for this decision are as shown in the judgment of the first instance. It shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit
[Attachment]
Judges Kim Jong-chul (Presiding Judge)