logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.11.21 2017구단20655
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 16, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and was discharged from military service on November 16, 2015, with the right tree complex blurged blurged blurged blurged blurged blurged (hereinafter the instant award).

B. 1) On June 30, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) on the part of June 30, 2016, the Defendant applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation; (b) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s direct cause of the instant wound does not fall under the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State because it is difficult to regard the Plaintiff as “a certificate of satisfaction with the right-hand side generated from the dead body during the training or self-training,” and that there was causation between the occurrence or aggravation of the instant wound and the military item by combining the right-hand trees in the dead body after the self-training; and (c) subsequently, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.

(A) The fact that there is no dispute over the part corresponding to the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State among the above decisions (the disposition in this case).

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted in the New Disease Training Center that the right edges in the process of opening the new path during the new path training, and immediately after the assignment of the 53 group information and communication team to the 53 group information and communication unit, the Plaintiff re-exploiting the right edges from the gals of the gys of the gys of the gys of the gys of the gys of the gys of the gys of the gys of the instant disease, and the Plaintiff

After that, the Plaintiff received medical treatment for the injury and disease of the instant case at the Armed Forces Hospital, while wearing a glare during one month, and caused the injury of the instant case due to the prolonged wear of a glare, etc.

Thus, the difference in this case is caused by the aggravation of the disease of this case, which is directly related to the national hydrogen, etc., or in the course of treating the injury or disease.

arrow