logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2015.05.19 2014가합11322
보험에관한 소송
Text

1. The insurance contract entered in the separate sheet concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B is invalid.

2. Defendant C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 28, 2009, the Plaintiff and Defendant B concluded the instant insurance contract with Defendant C as the insured on August 28, 2009 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

The instant insurance contract includes the content that compensates 20,000 won per day of hospitalization as per day of hospitalization in the case of Defendant C’s hospitalization due to injury or disease.

B. Defendant C was hospitalized for 12 days from February 12, 2010 to February 23, 2010 after six months after the conclusion of the instant insurance contract and on February 12, 2010 on the ground of traffic accidents, with the diagnosis of “nives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives slives s slves s sknes sknes s sl.

Defendant C received a total of KRW 14,955,000 from the Plaintiff on the ground of the foregoing insured events.

Defendant C received KRW 14,955,000 from the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff filed a claim for return of unjust enrichment of KRW 11,430,00 among them.

Serial Nos. 12010-02-12, the amount paid as of the date of hospitalization (in case of re-hospitalize) by the name of the hospital in the name of the date of the accident, and the amount paid as of the date of the disease, 12.02.12 to 10.02 to 10.23, 10.240,000 Gap evidence 5 No. 2. 52220-11-21, vertebrate of the E hospital for Huriaebaeul 2010.22.

arrow