(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.08.25 2014고단4767

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.08.25 2014고단4767

강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2014, at around 22:00 on the date, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim E (hereinafter “D”) who is an employee of the Defendant and working together with the Defendant at the “D” singing room (hereinafter “D”) took singing; (b) brought the victim into the hands after the victim’s hand; (c) made the victim take the victim’s hand again; and (d) forced the victim to take the victim’s hand by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. The Defendant, at the time of the filing of the complaint, had dancing with the victim by singing. The Defendant, not forced but naturally, denied the criminal intent of the indecent act by compulsion by compulsion by stating that the Defendant would know of the reasons for the complaint at the time of about five to six months.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances can be acknowledged.

In other words, the defendant also testified that he had a blus dancing with the victim and that there was a physical contact between the defendant and the victim at a singing room. The witness F testified that the defendant had been present at the singing room that he had been stimuling the victim's hand, and stimuling the victim's hand, and that the witness G testified that at the time of the witness G, the defendant stimuling the victim with the victim and stated that "at the time of the stimuling into the stimuls, good and good," "at the time after the defendant stimuling the victim with the victim," while the victim had an ambiguous sentiment when the defendant stimuling and dancing the victim two times, there was no disadvantage in his work life, or that there was a concern that the victim might retire from his work, and the fact that the victim had been stimulating for five to six months after the defendant's work.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.09.07 2016고합27

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2020.05.07 2019노319

-의정부지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고단1358

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.04.23 2015노56

-부산지방법원 2017.08.23 2016고단6659