A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK5 cars.

On February 11, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 02:10, and proceeded at the speed of 471 lanes in front of the Katool Culture Center, which is located at the 471-ro of Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, at the center of the Ne-distance.

At that time, the signal lights are installed and traffic control is carried out. In such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well in the movement of pedestrians on the crosswalk and to proceed in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in violation of the signal, but did not find out the victim D (20 years old) walking along the crosswalk from the right side of the course to the left side of the crosswalk in accordance with the crosswalk signals, and did not find out the victim D (20 years old) who walked on the right side of the said passenger vehicle and got the victim go beyond the ground.

Although Defendant 1 suffered from a diversous salt base (influorial scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part of the trial record on the first trial by court;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site data photographs, etc.;

1. CCTV images CDs used to block spirits from a national bank;

1. A medical certificate [the defendant was unaware of the occurrence of an accident]

However, the accident of this case has a shock to the extent that the vehicle can be connected with the vehicle, and considering the fact that the defendant was forced to speed immediately after the shock and again cut down the speed, the defendant is sufficiently aware of the accident.