Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of K5 si.

On July 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 22:40, and got to turn to the left at the right from the direction of the e-distance from the e-distance from the e-distance side of the Daejeon Jung-gu.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well with a signal, etc. and to prevent an accident by driving safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of failing to make a left turn in violation of the signal, the part on the left side of the victim C(46 ) driving of the victim C(46 Systala car, which was proceeding from the four-distance distance to the four-distance line, was received as the front part of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant at the above occupational negligence inflicted injury on the instant C, such as salt, tensions, etc. of a string that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim E (59 years of age) who was on board a string car, who was on board the instant car, suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc. of a shoulder pipe that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F and C;

1. A criminal report and a statement of actual investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are against the Defendant’s wrongness, five times of fines, but before and after 2004, the vehicle affiliated with the taxi mutual aid association is considered to be somewhat inconvenient, and the sentencing data recorded in the records, including the background of the instant case and the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the following factors.