A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, together with wife C, was residing in Category D Housing 101.

At around 14:40 on August 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a car, such as: (b) the front and front door of the car, even if the Defendant was aware of the fact that wife C was late to have returned home, and that the vehicle located in the front parking lot of the building located in the D’s front of the D’s house could be damaged by the vehicle; (c) the Defendant, even though having been aware of the fact that the vehicle located in the front of the D’s building could not be damaged by the vehicle; and (d) the Defendant d’s 101 glass of the D’s D’s 101 glass, which was located in the parking lot, was flicked to the victim’s vehicle, so that the vehicle’s front and front door of the D’s 1,125,428 won would be far away from the front and rear door of the vehicle

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 366 (Selection of Imprisonment)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Considerations, such as one time (including the destruction of and damage to goods) and ten times (including the destruction of and damage to goods) of the sentence related to violence on the grounds of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act, two times of a fine, three times of a suspended sentence of a dual punishment, three times of a suspended sentence of a dual punishment, 17 times of a fine for a dual punishment, 4 times of a fine concerning the destruction of property (after 2006)