logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.01.22 2015고단1945
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2015, the Defendant sent to the head of Dong who was drinking if he was in a place where D or victim E(66 years) met with the former head of the village around 14:00 on July 12, 2015.

As such, the Defendant, who had been drinking Do, said that “I would have been drinking Do, so I would like to see this later because I would have been drinking Do,” was “I would not have this donge.

When she took a bath that he/she had, such as “the same brut”, he/she assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s brue one time by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site and accompanying photographs of victims);

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. The defense counsel’s assertion regarding the defense counsel’s assertion under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of the workhouse is alleged to the effect that the defendant’s act is a legitimate act as a passive resistance. However, in light of the background leading up to the assault and the degree of assault recognized by the evidence above, it is difficult to view the defendant’s act as a passive resistance. Thus, the above assertion

arrow