The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant found the victim's apartment to be returned to the victim because of the goods to be returned to the victim, and the victim's apartment model was divided two times, and there was no other reaction, and the defendant tried to depart from the Republic of Korea, and there was no act to create psychological apprehensions for the victim by spreading the apartment house of the victim. The court below found the defendant guilty of all the charges of this case. The judgment of the court below is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim was a person who was a infinite relationship with the victim, who tried not to meet the relationship with the victim, but the defendant continued to attempt to contact with the victim, and the victim was found in the apartment site where the victim was living. ② The defendant reported the victim to the police even on October 24, 201, before the transfer of the case, and the victim caused disturbance and disturbance, and the defendant reported the victim to the police, and the defendant did not find the house at large. ③ On the date of the instant case, the victim was her husband and her husband, but the defendant was divided into two parts with her husband and her first husband, but the victim continued to move the vehicle to another place, and the defendant continued to have his/her right to contact with the victim on the day when she was reported to the police of the victim, and the defendant continued to have his/her right to contact with the victim on the day when she was reported to the Seoul High Court for 20 years after 20 years after the first apartment.