The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, even though the defendant could sufficiently recognize the facts charged of this case where the defendant injured the victim by damaging the victim, and thereby acquitted the defendant.

2. Determination

A. On November 16, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 22:55, the Defendant: (b) sought a victim E (the age of 76) from a corridor front of the front of the front door of the family of the Defendant (No. 1116 Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon)’s D apartment 116 Dong-gu, 1801, 1801 to return to the victim’s her child, his/her father and her mother; and (c) did not return to the court; (d) demanded the victim to reverse the testimony given in the court; and (e) carried out approximately six-day treatment for the victim by pushing the victim

B. The judgment of the court below held that the court below: (1) the defendant was called to the police by making a report to the effect that the insurance-related person is threatening him, after the occurrence of the case in this case, and (2) the victim was able to see the stick because the victim's child F and G were not able to sat down because he did not sat down the victim, and it seems that he was able to sat down because he did not unsat down the victim, and (3) the victim made a statement at the investigative agency that he was under the first investigation that he was pushed the victim's arms, and stated that he was sat down, not the defendant's arms, but the defendant was unsat down at the court of the court below, and (4) the victim's statement that he was pushed up with the victim as a witness, and continued to sat down the victim's body at the court of appeal.