Text
1. As to the Plaintiff’s real estate listed in separate sheet 1 to 4:
(a) Defendants B, C, D, E, and F are shares of 2/13, respectively;
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is a clan of which the plaintiff is the 18th descendant L, and the defendants are the plaintiff's clan members.
B. (i) At the time of the land investigation on May 1913, 1913, the net M was confirmed to be the owner of Goyang-gun N (O in Goyang-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the administrative district name of which was changed, hereinafter referred to as “O in Goyang-si, Goyang-si”) P 1,173, Q former 350 (attached Form 3), and R 204 square meters (attached Table 4) prior to R, and was identified to be the owner of the said land. At the time of the forest investigation on August 1918, 1918 (Attachment Table 4), it was confirmed to be the owner of Goyang-gun-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, and Goyang-si, the said land was assessed.
Shebly, each of the above lands became a registration of ownership preservation in the name of the deceased T on December 31, 1974.
The provisional registration of the right to claim transfer of ownership was completed on February 25, 1975 in the name of Defendant D, H, I, and J on February 1, 1973, Q 350, and R 204 in each of the above lands.
On February 25, 1975, the title transfer registration was made in the name of Defendant D, H, I, and J on February 25, 1975.
Article 16(1) of the former Act on the Protection of Land, etc. and Article 162(2) of the former Act on the Protection of Land, etc. and Article 17(2) of the former Act on the Protection of Land, etc. and Article 17(2) of the former Act on the Protection of Land, etc. and Article 17(2) of the former Act on the Protection of Land, etc. and Article 17(2) of the former Act on the Protection of Land, etc.
W, divided from the 9th M&T, the land category of X-8 square meters of forest (attached Form 5 real estate and road) was divided.
C. The deceased on March 12, 2001, and on March 12, 2001, Defendant B, C, D, E, and F inherited each of 2/13 shares, and the network G inherited 3/13 shares.
G was deceased in around 2006, and Defendant D was appointed as an administrator of the G G's inherited property around 2009.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The land of this case (attached Form No. 1) is the deceased’s clan’s religious ground M (a. Y ownership) and at the time of the land survey and forest survey during the Japanese occupation period.