1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from January 21, 2017 to July 12, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person working as C University D and assistant professor, and the Defendant is an operator and reporter of “E”, a local press company.

B. On August 11, 2014, the Defendant posted an article containing the following (hereinafter “F”) as the title “F” on the Internet news bulletin board (hereinafter “instant article”).

During the process of additional investigation into the suspicion of illegal outflow of foreign currency by G University (private junior college curriculum), the president of HK appears to be “a relationship between IF professors and researchers in the same school.”

This means that the university president and female professor have been engaged in an “influent physical contact” under the name of “enfluent person”, which is expected to be a strike.

On June 25, 2006, JJ police stations are conducting (comfort) investigations.

However, in the course of the investigation of the pertinent case, the relationship between the president and the professor is revealed.

A. The president asserts that “I professors and Iam dead. The two were dead in the process of undermining the suspicion of indecent act against sexual intercourse.” The president also asserted that “I am sleep in the special hotel in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.”

(B) The President asserted that he/she is “indecent act of sexual intercourse” during the process of piracy to escape from his/her suspicion of “indecent act of sexual intercourse.”

In addition, it is revealed that two parties have "incompetient relationship", which is likely to be an satise of morality in a different level from "illegal outflow."

(hereinafter omitted)

C. In the instant article, G University refers to the Plaintiff’s president, K, and I Credit Union professor, who is working for the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Although the plaintiff 1 did not have a relation with K, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff 1 had a improper relation with K, and the plaintiff stated false facts that the plaintiff had a relation with K, and thus the plaintiff's honor is serious.