logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.03.29 2012고단11953
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On September 20, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's subsidiary branch, and completed the enforcement of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on February 10, 2008.

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On March 13, 2008, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim at an influent place and caused the victim to have it covered with KRW 80 million. The purchase of this was made by false means to the effect that there is a lot of profit-making profit, and that there is a lot of profit-making profit. First of all, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the transfer of KRW 8 million to the down payment.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to make investment by purchasing the loan.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 8 million won from the victim as a down payment on the same day.

B. On March 17, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would open a thickness real estate brokerage office to the victim” at the real estate agent office in the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Office for the operation of the victim. The Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million from the opening cost.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to operate the real estate intermediary with the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a remittance of KRW 20 million from the victim under the name of the partner on the same day.

C. On December 16, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A fine is not paid,” with the victim’s phone call at an influence place, to the effect that the Defendant would be repaid immediately if he/she borrowed KRW 4 million.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to complete the payment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 4 million from the victim for the same day as the borrowed money.

2. The Defendant against the victim E (F before the opening of the name) is in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on April 3, 2008.

arrow