Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Jeonju District Court-2016-B-3938 (Law No. 19, 2017)
Title
(Trialless Conduct) Cash donation constitutes a fraudulent act
Summary
(C) If a gift contract between the defendant and the delinquent taxpayer is established, the gift contract between the defendant and the delinquent taxpayer should be revoked as a fraudulent act, as it is highly probable that the transfer income tax claim will be established, and as such, the gift contract between the defendant and the delinquent taxpayer should be revoked as a fraudulent act.
Related statutes
Article 406 of the Civil Act
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2017Da238387
Plaintiff-Appellant
○○ State
Defendant-Appellee
○ ○
Judgment of the lower court
Jeonju District Court Decision 2015.19
Imposition of Judgment
2017.09.07
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per