logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 09. 07. 선고 2017다238387 판결
(심리불속행) 현금증여는 사해행위에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Jeonju District Court-2016-B-3938 (Law No. 19, 2017)

Title

(Trialless Conduct) Cash donation constitutes a fraudulent act

Summary

(C) If a gift contract between the defendant and the delinquent taxpayer is established, the gift contract between the defendant and the delinquent taxpayer should be revoked as a fraudulent act, as it is highly probable that the transfer income tax claim will be established, and as such, the gift contract between the defendant and the delinquent taxpayer should be revoked as a fraudulent act.

Related statutes

Article 406 of the Civil Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2017Da238387

Plaintiff-Appellant

○○ State

Defendant-Appellee

○ ○

Judgment of the lower court

Jeonju District Court Decision 2015.19

Imposition of Judgment

2017.09.07

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow