Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Criminal facts

The Defendant tried to perform D’s daily work due to inconvenience in daily life due to D’s visual disability 1st degree, the owner of facilities, etc. on the ground of Gwangju Mine-gu C, and E used the above building free of charge from Jun. 2, 2012, while performing remodeling and landscaping work on the above building.

On November 16, 2016, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the claim for the purchase price claim No. 502307 group filed by D against E at the court of Gwangju District Court 204 on November 16, 2016, and thereafter, “Defendant E shall not be subject to the question of the Defendant’s agent “I have performed remodeling and landscaping works on the instant real estate by taking about approximately KRW 53 million.”

I have no such effect.

“To the extent that the landscaped construction was known,” and “to the extent that the landscaped construction was

Also, the remodeling was also known

The answer was called “for example” to the question of “.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the police on April 19, 2017 against the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Copy of examination protocol of witness;

1. A criminal investigation report (Submission of victim data);

1. The investigation report (record attachment) [The evidence mentioned above is as follows: (a) one of the issues was whether D and E were performed for remodeling and landscaping in the warehouse building owned by D in the civil litigation instituted by D as joint defendants; (b) whether the person executing the construction was E and F was not an issue; and (c) the E and F were in a community relationship with the husband and wife in the lawsuit in question.

Therefore, since the person who implemented remodeling in the warehouse building is F, E did not carry out remodeling construction in the warehouse.

The defense counsel's assertion that the statement is not false shall not be accepted.

In addition, the defendant is adjacent to ① remodeling and landscaping construction of warehouse buildings and ② storage with respect to the construction implemented by E.