logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.08.04 2016고단250
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

11,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Changwon District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two (2) years, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015.

1. On January 15, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F at the E office of the Defendant’s management company, Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., located in Syang-si, G, Hayang-dong, Seoul, that “A project to create an industrial complex is being implemented on the high-speed area of the Hadong-dong, Seoul, and the said industrial complex formation project is urgently required for the fund for the management of the company to reduce the construction project.”

However, at the time, the defendant was not in the process of the construction of an industrial complex in the ancient-gun of Gyeongdong-gun, and there was no special profit because he did not receive the service payment from the (ju) industrial complex construction (the construction of the 2nd industrial complex in the Yongsan-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do). The enzym industry also did not have the possibility of receiving the service payment due to the lack of funds to transfer the industrial complex development project to another business entity. Therefore, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, the victim did not have the intent or ability to make a subcontract, or to repay the borrowed money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 3 million won from the victim to the account in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim as the borrowed money.

2. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant, who violated the law of fraud and defense against 10 million won in the name of a public official’s employment solicitation, shall employ F as class 9 regular employees at the E office of the said stock company, “F refers to a public official who is well aware of inside and outside the office, and is employed at class 9 as a victim G’s son(H).

On the other hand, at this occasion, there was a false statement to the effect that the gift of 5 million won per person to six public officials should be made, and that 30 million won per person shall be changed.

However, even if we receive money, there was no intention or ability to get the victims to work for viewing.

Defendant F. As above.

arrow