logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2015.05.14 2013고단660
횡령
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 7,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of 10 months.

2. Defendant A’s above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 1, 2008, the Defendant was delegated by G Co., Ltd. operated by the victim F of the victim F in 204 of the building 204, G Co., Ltd., the Defendant: (a) received a total of 151,750,000 won from Dec. 19, 2008 to Apr. 18, 201, for a total of 48 occasions from the victim from Dec. 19, 2008 to Apr. 18, 201.

On December 19, 2008, from around April 18, 201 to around April 18, 2011, the Defendant wired KRW 29,718,000 among the money transferred as above to B from around December 19, 200 to April 18, 201, to B under the same name as the business of attracting construction, and used KRW 28,000,000 for incidental expenses, such as office operation expenses and cost of purchasing equipment, etc. related to the above business, and had the victim keep KRW 27,282,00 for the victim.

At around that time, the Defendant embezzled the above KRW 27,282,00 by arbitrarily using it for private purposes in the well-known area.

2. Defendant B

A. On December 19, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around December 19, 2008, G Co., Ltd. operated by the Victim F in 204, G Co., Ltd., located in the G Co., Ltd. in the Gyeonggi-si Seoul Metropolitan City E-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City, would allow the victim to attract the H and J formation construction from the above G Co., Ltd., Ltd., the cost of implementing the project

However, in relation to the above H, the Defendant entered into a service contract for the provision of convenience following the sale and purchase of a factory site, and post management, such as a cemetery relocation, with the K business cooperative, and even if the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to attract the construction of the factory site, even though he did not have the right to attract the construction of the factory site, he did not have an intention or ability to attract the construction of the factory site in G. Even if he did not have been granted the right to attract the construction of the factory site even in relation to the above J and

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.

arrow