The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (three years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and against the defendant, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and that the defendant's motion in the trial submitted a written application against the defendant's prior action.

However, considering that there is a possibility that the defendant could have caused the crime of this case due to mental problems, the method of the crime of special injury of this case is very cruel, and the quality of the crime is not somewhat weak.

A victim of violent crime using a lethal weapon without sea seems to have suffered a huge physical pain and mental shock, while drinking together with the defendant.

Until the trial of the case, the victim was unable to receive a written application from the victim.

In addition, in full view of the following circumstances: Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the fact that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the court below after the judgment of the court below, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.