2018 Do 9032 (a) Acceptance of a bribe

(b) Offering a bribe;

1. A.

2. B

Prosecutor

Attorney D in charge of the legal affairs corporation C (for Defendant A)

Daejeon High Court Decision 2018No 49 decided May 5, 2018

November 2018, 15

all appeals shall be dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are determined.

The court below maintained the judgment of the court of first instance that held Defendant A as not guilty of all facts charged against Defendant B on the ground that it is difficult to view that Defendant A was provided with B, such as drinking and drinking, under the pretext that Defendant B would aid Defendant B’s trial, and that it was proven beyond reasonable doubt. Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of relevant legal principles and records, the judgment of the court below is justifiable, and there is no error of misapprehending the legal principles on the establishment of the crime of receiving and receiving a bribe beyond the limit of free evaluation of evidence by violating the legal principles on logic and experience.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim Jae-hyung

Justices Jo Hee-de

Justices Min You-sook

Justices Lee In-bok and Lee Dong-won