Do 2018 Do 11906 A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery)

(b) Acceptance of bribe;

A

Defendant

Law Firm B

Attorney in charge C, D, E, F

Seoul High Court Decision 2018No 754 decided July 13, 2018

September 28, 2018

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are determined.

Examining the reasoning of the original judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly adopted, it is reasonable to maintain the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty of each of the facts charged in the instant case (Bribery) of violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes among the facts charged, as stated in the judgment of the lower court, and that this constitutes a violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Aggravation of Crimes, among the facts charged in the instant case, and that this case’s objection constitutes the receipt of a bribe in relation to the system, Esti Co., Ltd., and Esti Co., Ltd., Ltd., as well as the comprehensive communications. As the grounds for appeal are asserted in the judgment of the lower court, there is no error by misapprehending the legal principles on the calculation of the amount of bribe and the comprehensive crime.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim So-young

Justices Park Sang-ok

Jeju High Court Decision 205 Cho Jae-chul

Justices Noh Jeong-hee