logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.22 2016고단2702
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act (the date of confirmation: July 25, 2015) due to support for the safe production of a water source method clerk.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in slaughter business of livestock products under the name of “C” in the name of “C”.

Any person who intends to operate livestock slaughter business, milk collection business, or livestock processing business shall obtain permission from the competent Do Governor for each place of work, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Prime Minister.

Nevertheless, from July 26, 2015 (the day following the date on which the above judgment became final and conclusive) to May 2, 2016, the Defendant installed slaughter facilities, such as one sloping machine, one Doma, two knife, one plastic box, one knife, one knife, and one knife, one knife, and one knife, and one knife, and sold the knife average of 10 cm per day to the customers who found the place.

In this respect, slaughter business was operated without permission and violated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (e.g., details of control on slaughter without permission and attachment of photographs at the control site);

1. Article 45 (1) 1 and Article 7 (1) of the Sanitary Control of Livestock Products Act (Selection of a punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act that the defendant does not repeat the same kind of crime in the future;

The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's workplace is relatively small, the fact that the defendant has been punished by a fine due to the same crime, and the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, economic situation, etc.

arrow