A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., at the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch on October 12, 2009 and completed the execution of the sentence on June 14, 201.

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On March 1, 2012, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03 g of psychotropic drugs, in the Dcarpets operated by the Defendant, who is located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, Jinnam-si, in a manner of drinking in beer.

2. On June 2012, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03 g of psychotropic drug c.03 c.m., in the car page of the above paragraph (1) in the same manner as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of appraisal on narcotics and reply to requests for appraisal;

1. An investigation report (calculated additional charges);

1. Previous records of judgment: The application of inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (A convict confirmation) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (Amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 2011); Articles 60(1)3, 4(1), and 2 Subparag. 4(b) (the occupation of scopon medication for a police officer on the first time of March 2012) of the former Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.; Articles 60(1)2, 4(1), and 2 subparag. 3(b) (the occupation of scopon medication for a police officer on the first time of March 7, 2012) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.; Articles 60(1)2 and 4(

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. is that the defendant has been sentenced to six times of punishment for the same kind of crime, and in particular, the defendant has to be punished strictly in light of the fact that he again committed the crime of this case without being aware of even though he was the first head of the crime before his repeated crime.

However, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the age, character, character and environment of the defendant, shall be considered as a favorable condition for the defendant's confession.