Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, by a fine of one million won, by a defendant B, and by a fine of three million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is a person who operates the above hospital as the head of the hospital in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E convalescent, Defendant B is a person who serves as the head of the original administrative office in the E convalescent, Defendant A is a person who serves as the head of the original office in the E convalescent Hospital, F was a person who served as the head of the original office in the E convalescent Hospital, and G was a person who served as a facility manager in the E convalescent Hospital, and

1. The act of introducing, arranging, or inducing a patient to a medical institution or a medical person for profit, such as exempting or discounting the patient's share under the National Health Insurance Act or the Medical Care Benefits Act, offering money, goods, etc., or providing transportation convenience to many and unspecified persons, and the act of suggesting such act;

Nevertheless, from July 20, 2012 to January 30, 2015, the Defendants conspired and had the above F transport to the above hospital using the H white-type vehicle, which is a vehicle operating the hospital, the said F to the hospital, with blood tin patients J, K, L, M, N, N, andO residing in the I apartment of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the Defendants provided transportation convenience in collusion with the above F, leading patients to medical institutions for profit.

2. Defendant C

A. The Defendant, who is an employee of the Defendant, led the patient to a medical institution for commercial purposes, such as Paragraph 1, in connection with the Defendant’s business.

(b) No person, other than medical persons, shall provide medical services;

G around May 22, 2015, at the E convalescent Hospital located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, conducted a re-examination to N, etc. who is the patient of the above hospital, and performed medical practice despite that it is not a medical person.

The above G, who is an employee of the defendant, performed medical practice as above with respect to the defendant's business at the time of the above day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness G and P, respectively.