A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On November 17, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud at the Suwon Giwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 25, 2016.

[2] The Defendant: (a) established a company in collusion with D, E, or F, and G to establish and register a tentatively named “old corporation”; (b) opened an account in the name of the corporation by using it; (c) made the passbook and cash card connected to the said account; and (d) provided it to the soliciting book of the above large-scale one; and (c) offered the soliciting book of the large-scale one, such as D, etc. by using the passbook from the Defendant to sell it to the non-criminal organization, such as singing, lending, fraud, and illegal sports discussions.

1. On July 3, 2014, the Defendant conspiredd to make an event, such as a false entry into a public electronic record and a false public electronic record, and made an application for registration of incorporation of a juristic person to a public official in charge of registration in the Seoul Central District Court’s registry office located in 14-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seoul District Court, a juristic person’s capital is not paid, a juristic person is not established, and a juristic person is not established.

A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, shall enter the computer system in the corporate registry so that the registration of the establishment of the “H” corporation is completed, and the said corporate registry was kept in the aforementioned computerized system.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with F, G, and the public official in collusion with D, E, etc., who is a book for the recruitment of passbooks, made false reports to record false facts on the corporate register, which is the same electronic records as the original copy of the process deed, and used them by making it available on the corporate register computerized. From around that time to January 29, 2015, the Defendant attached this method.