A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On December 3, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year in the Seoul Central District Court for criminal fraud, etc. on August 11, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 11, 2015.

[2] The Defendant: (a) established a company and registered an account under the name of the juristic person in collusion with the invitation books for public circulation such as C(D) and E(F) although the Defendant did not intend to actually operate the company; (b) opened an account under the name of the juristic person; (c) made the passbook and cash card connected to the said account; and (d) supplied the above invitation books for public offering of public circulation passbook such as C, etc. to the above public offering books; and (c) recruited to sell them to the non-criminal organization, such as hosting, lending, fraud, and illegal sports discussions.

1. On July 22, 2014, the Defendant conspiredd as above, such as a false entry into a public electronic record, and a false public electronic record, etc., and prepared a false application for registration of a corporation with no intent to establish and operate the corporation, and filed an application for registration of incorporation with a public official in charge of registration of a corporation with no intent to establish and operate the corporation, by making it a director of the Seoul Central District Court registered in the registry office of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul District Court located in 14th three-lane as Seoul Seocho-gu court

A public official in charge of the above registration, who is unaware of such circumstance, shall enter the computer system in the corporate registry so that the registration of the establishment of the “G” corporation is completed, and the said corporate registry was kept by the computerized system in which the aforementioned false facts are recorded.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the invitation books C, E, etc. for the public official, made a false report to record false facts on the corporate registry of the same electronic records as the original copy of the fair deed by making a false report to the public official, and exercised it by making it available on the corporate registry computerized. From around that time to August 4, 2014, the Defendant extended to two times in total, such as the list of crimes (1).