logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.10.02 2012가단15272
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 35,803,882 to Plaintiff A; KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff C and D; and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A is the driver of E E Leto or Truck, Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff C, Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with F to G cab. 2) On June 5, 2010, F caused an accident that Plaintiff A was driven by the central line while driving the said cab in the Nowon-gu, Yongcheon-si (hereinafter “instant accident”).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 11, video (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of whole pleadings

B. The occurrence of liability F caused the instant accident by negligence committed in the middle line, and thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid manager.

2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;

At the time of the accident, the computation of the amount of damages shall be based on the calculation of the amount of losses, which deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month as a simple interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

The remainder of the following contents, excluding consolation money, is against the plaintiff A.

(2) Gender: male 2) Employment, income, and operation period A until June 19, 2018, when he/she reaches the age of 63 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da49360, Mar. 25, 1997) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Da49360, Jun. 198).

3) No determination is made on the grounds that the Plaintiffs’ rate of loss of work ability is not alleged against the neutronological disorder. ① Mental health disorder, such as gymnasium, gymnasium, and hymnasium: 4.8% (Grasium).

arrow