A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was aware of the victim C(n, 42 years of age) and the elementary school steering committee in the course of their activities, and was in a close friendly manner.

On February 25, 2014, around 00:40 on February 25, 2014, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol with the victim in the E-cafeteria in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, became a vision for the school steering committee, and was dissatisfied with each other’s abusiveism.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to go on the spot while "I will not communicate in the future", and the victim saw the defendant's occupationer and gets out of the restaurant.

The Defendant continued to fight with the victim by putting the parts of the Defendant’s arms up to the front of the restaurant.

In the above process, the Defendant changed the part of the victim’s cocon part to the body part that the Defendant could not know during the above process, and suffered injury to the victim, such as a bridge that requires medical treatment for about 28 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. On-site reports;

1. A copy of the statement of opinion (Finviation) and one copy of the certificate of injury (G hospital), one copy of the certificate of hospitalization (Finviation) and eight copies of the receipt of medical expenses, eight copies of the receipt of medical expenses, two copies of the statement of payment of medical expenses, and three copies of the photograph of the victim's damaged part photograph;

1. Application of the investigative report (Attachment of CCTV images inside a restaurant) -CCTV photographs, video CDs 1 statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to the evidence of determination as to the assertion that the act of provisional payment order is a justifiable act of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the defendant has been ppuried and got out of the restaurant in the situation where the victim prevents the defendant from having a place, such as a dular, etc., by leaving the restaurant, and the victim suffered the victim's wife in the process where the victim continued to have his/her sond and her sond and prevented the defect.