1. The defendant is paid KRW 5,266,61 from the plaintiff, and at the same time, he is stated in the attached Table to the plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The facts of recognition are: (a) the Plaintiff entered into an entrustment management agreement with the Defendant, who is engaged in trucking cargo transportation services on May 4, 200 and the Defendant, under which the title of ownership registration shall vest in the Defendant; (b) the Defendant is entrusted with the right to operate and manage the instant motor vehicle; and (c) the Defendant shall pay monthly admission fees, insurance premiums, etc. (hereinafter “instant agreement”); and (d) the fact that the instant agreement was concluded on April 30, 2015 that the ownership registration title of the instant motor vehicle was attributed to the Defendant; or (e) the fact that the agreement was concluded on April 30, 2015 does not conflict between the parties; or (e) the overall purport of entry in

B. In accordance with Article 3(4) of the Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Act No. 7100 of Jan. 20, 2004) and Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, individual trucking transport businesses using one truck have been possible. Article 3(2) of the Addenda of the Act provides that “any person who intends to operate a trucking transport business with a trucking transport business after cancelling the relevant title trust or entrustment contract from December 31, 2004 among those who are entrusted with a trucking transport business by a truck under title trust with a person operating a trucking transport business at the time of the promulgation of this Act may, notwithstanding the amended provisions of Article 3(5)1, file an application for permission with the Minister of Construction and Transportation, and the Minister of Construction and Transportation, upon receipt of an application for permission, may grant permission to the relevant applicant, may terminate the entrustment contract and operate individual trucking transport business.”

C. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant, except in extenuating circumstances, on April 30, 2015, caused the termination of the consignment management contract with respect to the instant motor vehicle to the Plaintiff.