1. The Defendant terminated the consignment management contract as of July 14, 2015 with respect to the motor vehicles listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff.

1. The defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of trucking transport business.

On October 6, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an entrustment management contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the content that the title of registration of ownership shall be vested in the Defendant and the truck, and the right of operation and management of the motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) shall be entrusted by the Defendant, and the Defendant shall be paid monthly access management fees, insurance premiums, etc., and the ownership registration of the instant motor vehicle shall be vested in the Defendant.

In accordance with Article 3(4) of the Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Act No. 7100 of Jan. 20, 2004), and Article 3(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, individual trucking transport businesses using one trucking transport business have been possible. Article 3(2) of the Addenda of the Act provides that “any person who intends to operate a trucking transport business with a trucking transport business under title trust from December 31, 2004 among those who are entrusted with the trucking transport business by a truck under title trust with a person operating a trucking transport business at the time of the promulgation of this Act may, notwithstanding the amended provisions of Article 3(5)1, file an application for permission with the Minister of Construction and Transportation, and the Minister of Construction and Transportation, upon receipt of an application for permission, may terminate the entrustment contract and operate an individual trucking transport business.”

On July 14, 2015, the copy of the complaint of this case, including the Plaintiff’s expression of intent to terminate the contract of this case against the Defendant, was delivered to the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is about the motor vehicle of this case to the plaintiff unless there are special circumstances.