1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff worked as an employee of the E Regional Housing Association (hereinafter “instant association”) in the Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, who promoted the regional housing association project (hereinafter “instant project”).

From November 2012, the Plaintiff shared the business of selecting the contractor with Defendant C, etc. on the part of the Plaintiff’s order and effort. On April 25, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with Defendant C, the representative director of the instant association, and the so-called PM service company, which conducts the business of selecting the contractor of the instant association with Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant Company”), and conducting and managing the overall business of the instant case. The service cost was KRW 300 million (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

Even after the Plaintiff, the instant association and the Defendant concluded a contract to set the special bonus rate of KRW 420,000 on August 14, 2013 to change the service cost to KRW 7220,000,000, by setting the aforementioned special bonus rate of KRW 4220,000,000, on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff had to make profits from the instant association as a specialized design of partial apartment units, and a plan for reducing the

As such, Defendant Company and Defendant C agreed to divide the above service costs and special performance rates into half of the Defendants Company and the Plaintiff, since it had a significant impact on the Plaintiff’s efforts to select the Defendant Company as a service company and receive special performance rates.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff the above performance-based bonus of KRW 420,000,000 and KRW 210,000,000 and damages for delay.

2. On April 25, 2013, the instant association and the Defendant Company entered into a service contract with the content that the Defendant Company is in charge of the PM business of the instant business and received KRW 300 million in return, as alleged by the Plaintiff, and thereafter the remuneration was changed to KRW 720,000,000,000 thereafter, there is no dispute between the parties.