logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단2173
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of thirty thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant leased Seo-gu Ctel 1306, 1401, and 1409, and had the above E conduct of similarity by advertising the trade name and telephone number "D" on the Internet website from February 2018 to April 5, 2018 for many unspecified male customers, and employed and operating commercial sex E and F on condition that the male customer would be 50,000 won per male customer. On April 5, 2018, the Defendant reported the above advertisements within 16:00, around 1401 of the above officetel, and had the above E conduct of similarity by reporting the above advertisements from G, which was 80,000 won from the male purchaser of the above G, and using the above G’s sexual flag hand, and found the similarity by reporting the above advertisements to the above 16:400,000 won as the above officetel’s name and 40:10,000 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of interrogation of each police officer in relation to E or G;

1. Publicity photographs of the respondent A's website;

1. Application of each protocol of seizure and the statutes governing the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 (Joint Imposition of Imprisonment and Fines);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Consideration of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The grounds for sentencing of a criminal defendant under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - the defendant's mistake is recognized, the operating period is not relatively long, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment

arrow