All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the F and AR’s legal statement that Defendant C did not look at the victim F, the judgment of the court below which found Defendant C guilty is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, even though it cannot be deemed that the Defendant committed assault against the victim F.

B. Each sentence of the lower court against the Defendants (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the Defendants A, three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the Defendants B, and a fine of three million won for the Defendants C) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On August 6, 2017, around 04:15, the summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 04:15, the Defendants came to know that there was a vision between the Defendant C and the Victim F (the age of 31) while drinking alcohol at the E Point D. Defendant A, and Defendant A came to have a horse dispute with the victim. Defendant A came to know the victim’s face at the tebb on the ground that the victim’s and the victim’s walk fright and walk fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright, and Defendant B and the Defendant C continued to fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright.