Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants conspired with each other on August 21, 2015, from around 15:00 to around 15:46, the Defendants interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by failing to enter the said restaurant business by preventing customers who were in the said restaurant from entering the outside and going to the outside and going to the outside of the restaurant.

2. On August 21, 2015, at around 15:50, Defendant A’s sole criminal administration: (a) reported at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) and demanded that Defendant A interfere with his duties and return home from G during the process of carrying out the police box at which the police box was dispatched; (b) Defendant A threatened Defendant A by means of threatening Defendant A, “I ambling sing off, sing off, sing off, sing down, sing down, sing off, and sing off, the police sing down, sing off, and sing off,” and threatening Defendant A, “I sing off, sing off, sing off, and sing off, the police s

The Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender on the charge of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) brought the Defendant to a police box; and (c) obstructed the police officer G and H’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and investigation affairs by walking the Fbucks located in the police box to escort the Defendant twice; and (d) obstructed the police officer G and H’s legitimate performance of duties.

3. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct, on the ground that the police officers called out at the date and time set forth in the above paragraph (1) were prevented from being disturbed, destroyed a 7,00 won of the market price of the victim’s possession displayed in front of the J operated by the victim I, which was located near the said place, on the ground that the police officers called out at the same time and at the same place set forth in the above paragraph (1) were removed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of D, I, H and G;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.